- CVE-2009-4324 Use-after-free vulnerability in the Doc.media.newPlayer method in Multimedia.api in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.3, and 8.x before 8.2 on Windows and Mac OS X, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file using ZLib compressed streams, as exploited in the wild in December 2009.
__________ - CVE-2007-5659 Multiple buffer overflows in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 8.1.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PDF file with long arguments to unspecified JavaScript methods. NOTE: this issue might be subsumed by CVE-2008-0655.
__________ - CVE-2009-0927 Stack-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat 9 before 9.1, 8 before 8.1.3 , and 7 before 7.1.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted argument to the getIcon method of a Collab object, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-0658.
----Original Message-----
From: Paul Maas Risenhoover [mailto:ilovelibby@fastmail.fm]
Sent: 2010-01-27 9:02 AM
To: d15943@Tier.org.tw
Subject: letter to Solarz and US position on free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate independence thru Taiwanese
Attached and below is a letter to U.S. government on on free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate independence thru Taiwanese self-determination. Please support us.
Thanks.
Dear Press Officer Kavanaugh,
Kindly advise whether the US continues to stand by her duties under our Constitution, treaty obligations and laws, towards the defense of Formosa, and the rights of the native Formosans to engage in free speech rights secured by the First Article of Amendment to the US Constitution permitting petition for redress of their grievances against the United States, and her alter ego the Republic of China, located in exile, outside China, on Formosa, a trust territory for which the US asserted by Aide Memoire of October 25, 1950, in the travaux preparatoires for Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan concluded at San Franicsco, that Formosa did not by that treaty nor by the Treaty of Taipei (also see FRUS that the Treaty of Taipei did not cede Formosa from Japan to the Republic of China, using the terms legal Dept. China) become territory of China nor of the Republic of China, and asserting her solemn UN Charter and Constitutional law of war duties as Principal Victor in the Pacific theater against Japan, for the ultimate disposition of Formosa, consonant with the territorial integrity or historical claims of China thereto, and the Article 73 duties of the US as Administering Authority, through her alter ego, the Republic of China, on Taiwan, for Formosa.
Recently the fascist Chinese Nazi Party called the KMT has preferred treason charges to be brought by the Taiwan High Court, which is now investigating the judges and clerks of the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and DC Circuit, SCUS, and USDC DC Judge Rosemary Collyer, for conspiracy to cause .....
From: Paul Maas Risenhoover [mailto:ilovelibby@fastmail.fm]
Sent: 2010-01-27 9:02 AM
To: d15943@Tier.org.tw
Subject: letter to Solarz and US position on free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate independence thru Taiwanese
Attached and below is a letter to U.S. government on on free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate independence thru Taiwanese self-determination. Please support us.
Thanks.
Dear Press Officer Kavanaugh,
Kindly advise whether the US continues to stand by her duties under our Constitution, treaty obligations and laws, towards the defense of Formosa, and the rights of the native Formosans to engage in free speech rights secured by the First Article of Amendment to the US Constitution permitting petition for redress of their grievances against the United States, and her alter ego the Republic of China, located in exile, outside China, on Formosa, a trust territory for which the US asserted by Aide Memoire of October 25, 1950, in the travaux preparatoires for Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan concluded at San Franicsco, that Formosa did not by that treaty nor by the Treaty of Taipei (also see FRUS that the Treaty of Taipei did not cede Formosa from Japan to the Republic of China, using the terms legal Dept. China) become territory of China nor of the Republic of China, and asserting her solemn UN Charter and Constitutional law of war duties as Principal Victor in the Pacific theater against Japan, for the ultimate disposition of Formosa, consonant with the territorial integrity or historical claims of China thereto, and the Article 73 duties of the US as Administering Authority, through her alter ego, the Republic of China, on Taiwan, for Formosa.
Recently the fascist Chinese Nazi Party called the KMT has preferred treason charges to be brought by the Taiwan High Court, which is now investigating the judges and clerks of the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and DC Circuit, SCUS, and USDC DC Judge Rosemary Collyer, for conspiracy to cause .....
Virustotal
http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/8c07d970e1e5f5098725632c7376002055632659c142f63da269ee3cbcf5a33a-1264616420
File letter.pdf received on 2010.01.27 18:20:20 (UTC)
Result: 6/41 (14.64%)
a-squared 4.5.0.50 2010.01.27 HTML.Malicious!IK
AntiVir 7.9.1.154 2010.01.27 HTML/Malicious.PDF.Gen
Ikarus T3.1.1.80.0 2010.01.27 HTML.Malicious
McAfee-GW-Edition 6.8.5 2010.01.27 Script.Malicious.PDF.Gen
Norman 6.04.03 2010.01.27 JS/Shellcode.AA
Sophos 4.50.0 2010.01.27 Troj/PDFJs-B
Additional information
File size: 89375 bytes
MD5...: cf0063f0fa4acde50e38859bae7ceca2
Wepawet
File letter.pdf
MD5 cf0063f0fa4acde50e38859bae7ceca2
Analysis Started 2010-01-27 10:22:04
Report Generated 2010-01-27 10:22:10
Jsand 1.03.02 malicious
Exploits
Adobe Collab overflow Multiple Adobe Reader and Acrobat buffer overflows CVE-2007-5659
Adobe getIcon Stack-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Acrobat via the getIcon method of a Collab object CVE-2009-0927
doc.media.newPlayer Use-after-free vulnerability in the Doc.media.newPlayer method in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 8.0 through 9.2 CVE-2009-4324
----Original Message-----
From: Paul Maas Risenhoover [mailto:ilovelibby@fastmail.fm]
Sent: 2010-01-27 9:02 AM
To: d15943@Tier.org.tw
Subject: letter to Solarz and US position on free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate independence thru Taiwanese
Attached and below is a letter to U.S. government on on free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate independence thru Taiwanese self-determination. Please support us.
Thanks.
Dear Press Officer Kavanaugh,
Kindly advise whether the US continues to stand by her duties under our Constitution, treaty obligations and laws, towards the defense of Formosa, and the rights of the native Formosans to engage in free speech rights secured by the First Article of Amendment to the US Constitution permitting petition for redress of their grievances against the United States, and her alter ego the Republic of China, located in exile, outside China, on Formosa, a trust territory for which the US asserted by Aide Memoire of October 25, 1950, in the travaux preparatoires for Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan concluded at San Franicsco, that Formosa did not by that treaty nor by the Treaty of Taipei (also see FRUS that the Treaty of Taipei did not cede Formosa from Japan to the Republic of China, using the terms legal Dept. China) become territory of China nor of the Republic of China, and asserting her solemn UN Charter and Constitutional law of war duties as Principal Victor in the Pacific theater against Japan, for the ultimate disposition of Formosa, consonant with the territorial integrity or historical claims of China thereto, and the Article 73 duties of the US as Administering Authority, through her alter ego, the Republic of China, on Taiwan, for Formosa.
Recently the fascist Chinese Nazi Party called the KMT has preferred treason charges to be brought by the Taiwan High Court, which is now investigating the judges and clerks of the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and DC Circuit, SCUS, and USDC DC Judge Rosemary Collyer, for conspiracy to cause "Taiwan" to be US "Territory" in sedition against the Republic of China under Article 104 of the Criminal Code of China applied on Formosa by Taiwan. The factual basis for the investigation in case 98 Ta Zi 913 of the Taiwan High Court against named co-defendants Dr. Roger CS Lin, a ward of the US by birth as a native Formosan, and Shuibian Chen, also a ward of the US and former US Military Governor of Formosa, relies on their first amendment protected petitions for redress of grievances under the Constitution submitted to US courts for them by counsel retained for those purposes. Also we hope the Department can confirm the identity of W.L. Camp of CA/PPY who concurred, along with OLA James Hergens, in the Deborah Lehr letter to Congressman Solarz on passport treatment of Taiwan birth geographic nomenclature in the letter of Assistant Secretary of State Janet Mullins dated 8-19-1992 claiming the passport is an "official foreign policy document of the United States", rather than a document evincing the nationality and right to re-enter the US of a national of the United States. The full name of W.L. Camp is needed to ensure no conflict of interest exists for Charles Camp, Esq. of DC in the matters noted above for which he served as counsel in Roger CS Lin v USA.
In the sedition trial of Chen Nan-jung, the US stated that DOS had ordered AIT to express the views of the USG to the Taiwan authorities, and that such was done. Elsewhere the USG has advised Taiwanese Americans concerned with the future peacable disposition of Formosa that the US supports the free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate their self-determination, without expressing or supporting any substantive position either way on the political objectives or contents of such views, consistent with the President's unilateral position of support for an undefined and undetermined future "One China", given that the PRC does not recognize the ROC, and vice versa, and both the ROC and PRC claim that China is not yet reunified, while each acknowledging the special role of the US and her interests in these matters by their mutual deference to the USG in many fora on many occasions for many years as the proper interlocutor in which to engage to express their concerns regarding the ultimate disposition of Formosa out of the sovereignty of the US as Administering Authority trustee during the status quo. Also note that when the Ministry of Interior in 2005 refused to register the Taiwan Party, numerous successful appeals were made to the Executive Yuan Redress Committee resulting in nullification of the Ministry decisions implying that Formosa was the territory of the Republic of China and that advocacy of independence for Taiwan was "seditious" or "treason" or "plotting to destroy the national territorial integrity".
From: Paul Maas Risenhoover [mailto:ilovelibby@fastmail.fm]
Sent: 2010-01-27 9:02 AM
To: d15943@Tier.org.tw
Subject: letter to Solarz and US position on free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate independence thru Taiwanese
Attached and below is a letter to U.S. government on on free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate independence thru Taiwanese self-determination. Please support us.
Thanks.
Dear Press Officer Kavanaugh,
Kindly advise whether the US continues to stand by her duties under our Constitution, treaty obligations and laws, towards the defense of Formosa, and the rights of the native Formosans to engage in free speech rights secured by the First Article of Amendment to the US Constitution permitting petition for redress of their grievances against the United States, and her alter ego the Republic of China, located in exile, outside China, on Formosa, a trust territory for which the US asserted by Aide Memoire of October 25, 1950, in the travaux preparatoires for Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan concluded at San Franicsco, that Formosa did not by that treaty nor by the Treaty of Taipei (also see FRUS that the Treaty of Taipei did not cede Formosa from Japan to the Republic of China, using the terms legal Dept. China) become territory of China nor of the Republic of China, and asserting her solemn UN Charter and Constitutional law of war duties as Principal Victor in the Pacific theater against Japan, for the ultimate disposition of Formosa, consonant with the territorial integrity or historical claims of China thereto, and the Article 73 duties of the US as Administering Authority, through her alter ego, the Republic of China, on Taiwan, for Formosa.
Recently the fascist Chinese Nazi Party called the KMT has preferred treason charges to be brought by the Taiwan High Court, which is now investigating the judges and clerks of the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and DC Circuit, SCUS, and USDC DC Judge Rosemary Collyer, for conspiracy to cause "Taiwan" to be US "Territory" in sedition against the Republic of China under Article 104 of the Criminal Code of China applied on Formosa by Taiwan. The factual basis for the investigation in case 98 Ta Zi 913 of the Taiwan High Court against named co-defendants Dr. Roger CS Lin, a ward of the US by birth as a native Formosan, and Shuibian Chen, also a ward of the US and former US Military Governor of Formosa, relies on their first amendment protected petitions for redress of grievances under the Constitution submitted to US courts for them by counsel retained for those purposes. Also we hope the Department can confirm the identity of W.L. Camp of CA/PPY who concurred, along with OLA James Hergens, in the Deborah Lehr letter to Congressman Solarz on passport treatment of Taiwan birth geographic nomenclature in the letter of Assistant Secretary of State Janet Mullins dated 8-19-1992 claiming the passport is an "official foreign policy document of the United States", rather than a document evincing the nationality and right to re-enter the US of a national of the United States. The full name of W.L. Camp is needed to ensure no conflict of interest exists for Charles Camp, Esq. of DC in the matters noted above for which he served as counsel in Roger CS Lin v USA.
In the sedition trial of Chen Nan-jung, the US stated that DOS had ordered AIT to express the views of the USG to the Taiwan authorities, and that such was done. Elsewhere the USG has advised Taiwanese Americans concerned with the future peacable disposition of Formosa that the US supports the free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate their self-determination, without expressing or supporting any substantive position either way on the political objectives or contents of such views, consistent with the President's unilateral position of support for an undefined and undetermined future "One China", given that the PRC does not recognize the ROC, and vice versa, and both the ROC and PRC claim that China is not yet reunified, while each acknowledging the special role of the US and her interests in these matters by their mutual deference to the USG in many fora on many occasions for many years as the proper interlocutor in which to engage to express their concerns regarding the ultimate disposition of Formosa out of the sovereignty of the US as Administering Authority trustee during the status quo. Also note that when the Ministry of Interior in 2005 refused to register the Taiwan Party, numerous successful appeals were made to the Executive Yuan Redress Committee resulting in nullification of the Ministry decisions implying that Formosa was the territory of the Republic of China and that advocacy of independence for Taiwan was "seditious" or "treason" or "plotting to destroy the national territorial integrity".
Judicial interference by the KMT through institution of treason
charges against the Justices of the US Supreme Court as unindicted
co-conspirators is a gross affront to the close relations which the
Taiwan authorities uniquely enjoy with the United States under the
status quo and the Taiwan Relations Act, and an indignity to the memory
of the valiant American soldiers who paid the ultimate price in the
battles securing the rights of liberty to the native Formosans as a
result of our victory over Japan in the second World War and our
resettlement of more than a million Chinese refugees who lost the
Chinese civil war in China, to Formosa.
Thus, we implore AIT to acknowledge receipt hereof and to provide ward guidance to the US nationals on Formosa, about how we can protect our constitutional and human rights to free speech advocacy for the self-determination of Formosa as proposed by the US many times as documented in the FRUS series, through a plebiscite authorized by the US Congress, as Our Constitution, authorizes, for formation of a native civil government without prejudice to the claims of nor the continued existence in exile of the Republic of China.
China recently has acknowledged that Taiwan is the "Taiwan territory", thus implicitly recognizing and acknowledging the long-held US and Allied position on the de jure status quo of Formosa and the superior duties in interest of the US to secure her peacable progress towards self-determination consonant with all the UN Charter duties of the US and our Constitution and laws made in pursuance whereof.
We urge AIT to acknowledge that the US remains committed to free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate their self-determination, and to the unconstitutional illegality of any prosecutions conducted by "Taiwan" on the basis of claims by the Republic of China to the present de jure sovereignty of Formosa being reposed in the Chinese state or the Republic of China government however denominated, while the US has not foresworn her superior claims of right nor duties attendant thereto.
If advocacy of Taiwanese independence may rightly or lawfully constitute treason or sedition against the Republic of China, or China, the US should explain the dozens of FRUS references to just such efforts conducted, planned and supported by the US. Either Formosa is indeed a trust territory as the US by every right may assert under the UN Charter, or the USG maintained the undetermined status of Formosa only so the US could support the ROC in exile as a political fiction of the legitimate government for China, the legal consequences to individual American nationals who lawfully within their constitutional rights advocate for Formosan self-determination are extreme, as Roger Lin for example has already been hauled in for questioning under oath before the Taiwan High Court for treason carrying mandatory penalties of death or life imprisonment, either of which would violate the Eighth Amendment rights of the Formosan Americans under our Constitution during the status quo. Moreover the decision in Lin v US was ill-informed as the Judges admit because they were laboring under an inadequate record intentionally built by DOS and USDOJ and Melissa Patterson Esq. with the sole intent of depriving the native Formosans of their constitutional civil rights on the spurious basis of their race, ethinity, national origin, and former status of servitude, through an "information deficit"
which you all could have readily ameliorated by providing the court with ALL the record from FRUS on the sovereignty status of Formosa and US military government thereof, etc.
Securing the rights of Formosans to advocate independence is not support for independence, it is support for the rule of law and the US Constitution which ultimately governs your service to the American people under contract with the DOS through AIT.
We, the American people, demand AIT do their duty (as President Reagan declared in the farewell letter to David Laux, to "manage the relations between the people of the US and the people on Taiwan") to ensure the protection of the native Formosan advocates of Taiwanese independence to freely express their views without judicial inteference or pressure, and of all American nationals on Formosa to the same rights, as indeed the US vigorously protested Haiti's expulsion of Americans expressing certain political views, though peacable, yet contrary to the will of the powers that be, and such free speech being universal, its violation by force of coercion through the legal process is anathema to a free people in a free territory enjoying their natural freedom.
Respectfully,
Dr. Paul Maas Risenhoover
27-1 Yu Nung Rd. 5th Fl. 1-2, 5A3, East District, Tainan City 70164, the United States of America administered trust territory of Formosa
Thus, we implore AIT to acknowledge receipt hereof and to provide ward guidance to the US nationals on Formosa, about how we can protect our constitutional and human rights to free speech advocacy for the self-determination of Formosa as proposed by the US many times as documented in the FRUS series, through a plebiscite authorized by the US Congress, as Our Constitution, authorizes, for formation of a native civil government without prejudice to the claims of nor the continued existence in exile of the Republic of China.
China recently has acknowledged that Taiwan is the "Taiwan territory", thus implicitly recognizing and acknowledging the long-held US and Allied position on the de jure status quo of Formosa and the superior duties in interest of the US to secure her peacable progress towards self-determination consonant with all the UN Charter duties of the US and our Constitution and laws made in pursuance whereof.
We urge AIT to acknowledge that the US remains committed to free speech rights of native Formosans to advocate their self-determination, and to the unconstitutional illegality of any prosecutions conducted by "Taiwan" on the basis of claims by the Republic of China to the present de jure sovereignty of Formosa being reposed in the Chinese state or the Republic of China government however denominated, while the US has not foresworn her superior claims of right nor duties attendant thereto.
If advocacy of Taiwanese independence may rightly or lawfully constitute treason or sedition against the Republic of China, or China, the US should explain the dozens of FRUS references to just such efforts conducted, planned and supported by the US. Either Formosa is indeed a trust territory as the US by every right may assert under the UN Charter, or the USG maintained the undetermined status of Formosa only so the US could support the ROC in exile as a political fiction of the legitimate government for China, the legal consequences to individual American nationals who lawfully within their constitutional rights advocate for Formosan self-determination are extreme, as Roger Lin for example has already been hauled in for questioning under oath before the Taiwan High Court for treason carrying mandatory penalties of death or life imprisonment, either of which would violate the Eighth Amendment rights of the Formosan Americans under our Constitution during the status quo. Moreover the decision in Lin v US was ill-informed as the Judges admit because they were laboring under an inadequate record intentionally built by DOS and USDOJ and Melissa Patterson Esq. with the sole intent of depriving the native Formosans of their constitutional civil rights on the spurious basis of their race, ethinity, national origin, and former status of servitude, through an "information deficit"
which you all could have readily ameliorated by providing the court with ALL the record from FRUS on the sovereignty status of Formosa and US military government thereof, etc.
Securing the rights of Formosans to advocate independence is not support for independence, it is support for the rule of law and the US Constitution which ultimately governs your service to the American people under contract with the DOS through AIT.
We, the American people, demand AIT do their duty (as President Reagan declared in the farewell letter to David Laux, to "manage the relations between the people of the US and the people on Taiwan") to ensure the protection of the native Formosan advocates of Taiwanese independence to freely express their views without judicial inteference or pressure, and of all American nationals on Formosa to the same rights, as indeed the US vigorously protested Haiti's expulsion of Americans expressing certain political views, though peacable, yet contrary to the will of the powers that be, and such free speech being universal, its violation by force of coercion through the legal process is anathema to a free people in a free territory enjoying their natural freedom.
Respectfully,
Dr. Paul Maas Risenhoover
27-1 Yu Nung Rd. 5th Fl. 1-2, 5A3, East District, Tainan City 70164, the United States of America administered trust territory of Formosa
http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be
No comments:
Post a Comment